New and Novel

Novelty is the most fundamental characteristic of patentability. The novelty requirement ensures that an inventor has truly created something new. To gain a patent, knowledge in the prior art cannot anticipate the claimed subject matter. This basic rule protects the public domain of technical knowledge. Novelty prevents anyone from obtaining an exclusive right to something already in the public domain.

The novelty rule requires that a single prior art reference contain each and every feature of the claimed invention. Prior knowledge is called prior art. Anticipation requires one to assess the current state of public knowledge. Then one must make sure that each and every element of the claimed invention must appear expressly or inherently in that single reference.

§ 102, states:

A person shall be entitled to a patent unless—

(a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent, or

(b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States, or

(c) he has abandoned the invention, or

(d) the invention was first patented or caused to be patented, or was the subject of an inventor’s certificate, by the applicant or his legal representatives or assigns in a foreign country prior to the date of the application for patent in this country on an application for patent or inventor’s certificate filed more than twelve months before the filing of the application in the United States, or

(e) The invention was described in—

(1) an application for patent, published under section 122(b), by another filed in the United States before the invention by the applicant for patent, except that an international application filed under the treaty defined in section 351(a) shall have the effect under this subsection of a national application published under section 122(b) only if the international application designating the United States was published under Article 21(2)(a) of such treaty in the English language; or

(2) a patent granted on an application for patent by another filed in the United States before the invention by the applicant for patent, except that a patent shall not be deemed filed in the United States for the purposes of this subsection based on the filing of an international application filed under the treaty defined in section 351(a); or

(f) he did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented, or

(g)(1) during the course of an interference conducted under section 135 or section 291, another inventor involved therein establishes, to the extent permitted in section 104, that before such person’s invention thereof the invention was made by such other inventor and not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed, or

(2) before such person’s invention thereof, the invention was made in this country by another inventor who had not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed it. In determining priority of invention under this subsection, there shall be considered not only the respective dates of conception and reduction to practice of the invention, but also the reasonable diligence of one who was first to conceive and last to reduce to practice, from a time prior to conception by the other.

  • Contact

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Subject

    Your Message

    Please note that contacting us via email will not establish an attorney-client relationship. The attorney-client relationship can only be established after the firm has determined that we are able and willing to accept the engagement and we have entered into a written engagement agreement. Please do not send any confidential information unless we specifically request it. Information communicated without such authorization may not be treated as confidential, secret or otherwise be protected from disclosure and the firm will not be precluded from representing parties adverse to you in any matter.